Iranian South Medical Journal
مجله طب جنوب
Iran South Med J
Medical Sciences
http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir
57
journal57
1735-4374
1735-6954
10.61882/ismj
fa
jalali
1405
6
1
gregorian
2026
9
1
29
4
online
1
fulltext
other
بررسی دلایل سلب اعتبار مقالات پرستاری: مطالعهای مبتنی بر دادههای
Exploring the Causes of Retraction in Nurs-ing
Papers: A Study Based on Retraction Watch Data
پرستاری
Nursing
پژوهشي
Original
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#1f4e79">زمینه:</span></span></span></span></b> <span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">حفظ اعتبار و اصالت پژوهش در حوزه پرستاری به دلیل تأثیر مستقیم بر کیفیت مراقبت از بیمار ضروری است. با توجه به افزایش مقالات سلباعتبارشده در این رشته، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل دلایل مؤثر بر سلب اعتبار مقالات پرستاری انجام شد.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#1f4e79">مواد و روشها:</span></span></span></span></b> <span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">این مطالعه توصیفی- تحلیلی از نوع پیمایشی روی </span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">۲۰۲</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"> مقاله سلب اعتبارشده حوزه پرستاری بازیابی شده از پایگاه </span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">Retraction Watch</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"> در تاریخ 5 ژانویه 2025 انجام شد. دادهها با چکلیست محقق ساخته گردآوری و با آزمونهای من– ویتنی (</span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">Mann–Whitney U test</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">) و همبستگی اسپیرمن در نرم افزار </span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d">SPSS</span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"> ویرایش 27 تحلیل شدند. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#1f4e79">یافتهها:</span></span></span></span></b> <span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">میانه فاصله انتشار تا سلب اعتبار تقریباً 13/93 ماه و میانه تعداد نویسندگان 3 نفر بود. بیشترین انتشار مقالات در سال </span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">۲۰۲۲ (52/97</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt"> درصد) و بیشترین سلب اعتبار در سال </span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">۲۰۲۳ (</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">حدود </span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">49</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">/</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">40</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt"> درصد) رخ داد. کشور چین (حدود 70 درصد) و ناشر </span></span></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">Hindawi</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt"> (62/</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">87</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt"> درصد) بیشترین سهم را داشتند. 69/</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">8</span></span></span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt"> درصد مقالات در مجلات بدون رتبه منتشر شده بودند. شایعترین دلایل سلب اعتبار داوری ناکافی یا نادرست، سرقت ادبی، نقض قوانین، دادهسازی و نتایج نامعتبر بود. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#1f4e79"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">نتیجهگیری:</span></span></span></span></span></b> <span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:10.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#0d0d0d"><span style="letter-spacing:-.1pt">تمرکز بالای سلب اعتبار در مجلات بدون رتبه و نقش برجسته داوری ناکافی بیانگر نیاز به بازنگری در فرآیندهای داوری است. تقویت سازوکارهای ارزیابی و آموزش پژوهشگران میتواند به کاهش تخلفات و ارتقای کیفیت مقالات پرستاری کمک کند.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><a name="_Hlk237672607"></a><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060">Abstract<i></i></span></span></span></span></b></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060">Background:</span></span></span></span></b> <span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#404040"><span style="letter-spacing:.1pt">Maintaining the credibility and authenticity of nursing research is essential, as it directly impacts the quality of patient care. Given the increasing number of retracted articles in this field, the present study aimed to analyze the primary causes of retractions in nursing literature.</span></span></span></span></span><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060"></span></span></span></span></b></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060">Materials and Methods</span></span></span></span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#404040"><span style="letter-spacing:.1pt">:</span></span></span></span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#404040"><span style="letter-spacing:.1pt"> This descriptive-analytical survey evaluated 202 retracted nursing articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database on January 5, 2025. Data were collected using a researcher‑made checklist and analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Spearman’s rank correlation test in SPSS version 27.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060">Results:</span></span></span></span></b> <span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#404040"><span style="letter-spacing:.1pt">The median time from publication to retraction was approximately 13.93 months, with a median of three authors per article. The highest proportion of articles was published in 2022 (52.97%), while the highest rate of retraction occurred in 2023 (approximately 59.40%). Research originating from China (about 70%) and articles published by Hindawi (62.87%) accounted for the majority of retractions. Furthermore, 69.8% of the articles were published in unranked journals. The most common reasons for retraction were inadequate or flawed peer review, plagiarism, policy violations, data fabrication, and invalid results. </span></span></span></span></span><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060"></span></span></span></span></b></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#002060">Conclusion:</span></span></span></span></b> <span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:85%"><span style="font-family:"IRANSans",serif"><span style="color:#404040"><span style="letter-spacing:.1pt">The high concentration of retractions in unranked journals and the prominent role of inadequate peer review indicate the need to revise peer review processes. Strengthening evaluation mechanisms and training researchers can help reduce misconduct and improve the quality of nursing articles.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
سلب اعتبار, پرستاری, سوء رفتار علمی, اخلاق انتشار, داوری همتا
Retraction, Nursing, Scientific Misconduct, Publication Ethics, Peer Review
220
232
http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1115-101&slc_lang=other&sid=1
Mahdieh
Shahneh
مهدیه
شحنه
5700319475328460021207
0009-0004-7667-6864
No
Student Research Committee, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
کمیته تحقیقات و فناوری دانشجویی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران
Maryam
Nicknam
مریم
نیکنام
5700319475328460021208
5700319475328460021208
No
Student Research Committee, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
کمیته تحقیقات و فناوری دانشجویی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران
Sima
Afrashteh
سیما
افراشته
5700319475328460021209
5700319475328460021209
No
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of health, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
گروه آمار زیستی و اپیدمیولوژی، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران
Ali
Hamidi
علی
حمیدی
a.hamidi@bpums.ac.ir
5700319475328460021210
5700319475328460021210
Yes
Department of Medical Library & Information Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
گروه کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی پزشکی، دانشکده پیراپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر، بوشهر، ایران