Volume 25, Issue 6 (Iranian South Medical Journal 2023)                   Iran South Med J 2023, 25(6): 519-530 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nasirian M, Gharepapagh E, Fakhari A, Ghaffari Bavil M R, Gilani N. Evaluation of D-dimer Test Correlation with Lung Perfusion-Ventilation Scan in Patients Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Iran South Med J 2023; 25 (6) :519-530
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-1711-en.html
1- Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Department of Nuclear medicine, Medical School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Medical Radiation Sciences Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Department of Nuclear medicine, Medical School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , gharepapaghe@tbzmed.ac.ir
3- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center,Clinical Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz, Iran
4- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (1099 Views)
Background: Pulmonary embolism refers to the blockage of pulmonary arteries or a condition in which blood flow to the lungs is interrupted by a blood or fat clot. This phenomenon eventually leads to ische-mia and respiratory failure, which, without diagnosis and treatment, will result in the lungs losing their efficiency. Along with other diagnostic methods such as CT angiography and the D-dimer test, nuclear medicine scans are very helpful in embolism cases as a non-invasive diagnostic method. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to compare D-dimer tests with perfusion-ventilation scans in patients suspected of having pulmonary embo-lisms.
Materials and Methods: According to the Nuclear Medicine Association protocol, 112 patients underwent lung scintigraphy (V/Q) with SPECT imaging systems (Siemens Ecam models). D-dimer tests were admin-istered to all patients before the scan, at the discretion of the attending physician. Data were collected and the distribution of embolism probability (normal, low, high, and intermediate probabilities) among refer-ring patients was evaluated using Modified PIOPED criteria. In addition, D-dimer test values were evalu-ated and compared with possible pulmonary embolism diagnoses and clinical conditions (age, surgery, pregnancy, and underlying diseases).
Results: This study showed that 26.2% of patients with normal V/Q and 15.4% of patients with V/Q with a low probability of embolism had positive D-dimer tests. Accordingly, patients with intermediate and high probabilities of pulmonary embolism had 33.3% and 50% positive D-dimer tests, respectively. Addi-tionally, the results of the studies showed that the correlation with D-dimers negative (positive) in individ-uals less than or equal to 60 years, who had a normal scan and a low, intermediate, or high embolism probability was 74% (26%), 92.3% (7.7%), 83.3% (16.7%), and 0% (100%) respectively. Over 60-year-olds showed the same correlation with 73.3% (26.7%), 76.9% (23.1%), 55.6% (44.4%), and 100% (0%) respectively.
Conclusion: A higher D-dimer level does not correspond to a positive pulmonary embolism finding on V/Q scans. Furthermore, according to the obtained results, high D-dimer values are significantly correlated with V/Q scan findings in patients less than or equal to 60 years old, but there is no significant statistical correlation between high D-dimer values in patients with surgery, underlying diseases and pregnant wom-en with V/Q scan findings
 
Full-Text [PDF 566 kb]   (479 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: nuclear medicine
Received: 2023/05/3 | Accepted: 2023/06/13 | Published: 2023/07/4

References
1. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123(16): 1788-1830. [DOI]
2. Kucher N, Boekstegers P, Müller OJ, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2014; 129(4): 479-486. [DOI]
3. Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(10): 1037-1052. [DOI]
4. Pantaleo G, Luigi N, Federica T, et al. Amniotic fluid embolism. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2013; 14(14): 1163-1167. [Article]
5. Bhoobalan S, Chakravartty R, Dolbear G, et al. Correlation between the clinical pretest probability score and the lung ventilation and perfusion scan probability. Indian J Nucl Med 2013; 28(4): 221-5. [DOI]
6. Dalen JE. Pulmonary embolism: what have we learned since virchow? natural history, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Chest 2002; 122(4): 1440-1456. [DOI]
7. Choi S. Low molecular-weight heparin is better than warfarin for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Clin Res Prac 2017; 3(1): eP1068. [DOI]
8. Goggs R, Benigni L, Fuentes VL, et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2009; 19(1): 30-52. [DOI]
9. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Prospective study of exogenous hormones and risk of pulmonary embolism in women. Lancet 1996; 348(9033): 983-987. [DOI]
10. Ponto JA. Textbook of Radiopharmacy: Theory and Practice. Clin Nucl Med 2000; 25(7): 569. [Article]
11. Phillips JJ, Straiton J, Staff RT. Planar and SPECT ventilation/perfusion imaging and computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and metaanalysis of the literature, and cost and dose comparison. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(7): 1392-400. [DOI]
12. Langley PC. True North: Building Imaginary Worlds with the Revised Canadian (CADTH) Guidelines for Health Technology Assessment. Inov Pharm 2017; 8(2): 1-12. [DOI]
13. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, et al. An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(11): 812-821. [DOI]
14. Crawford F, Andras A, Welch K, et al. D‐dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016(8): CD010864. [DOI]
15. Karalezli A, Hasanoğlu HC, Kaya S, et al. Cut-off value of D-dimer in pulmonary thromboembolism and pneumonia. Turk J Med Sci 2009; 39(5): 687-692. [DOI]
16. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360(9349): 1914-1920. [DOI]
17. Ghafarian P, Rezaei S, Gharepapagh E, et al. Impact of Various Image Reconstruction Methods on Joint Compensation of Respiratory Motion and Partial Volume Effects in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging: Patients with NonSmall Cell Lung Cancer. Iran South Med J 2022; 25(4): 355-370. (Persian) [DOI]
18. Nilsson T, Söderberg M, Lundqvist G, et al. A comparison of spiral computed tomography and latex agglutination D-dimer assay in acute pulmonary embolism using pulmonary arteriography as gold standard. Scand Cardiovasc J 2002; 36(6): 373-377. [DOI]
19. Youssf ARI, Ismail MFM, ElGhamry R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer assay in suspected pulmonary embolism patients. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2014; 63(2): 411-417. [DOI]
20. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129(12): 997-1005. [DOI]
21. Bajc M, Schümichen C, Grüning T, et al. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46(12): 2429-2451. [DOI]
22. Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S, et al. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability. N Engl J Med 2019; 381(22): 2125-2134. [DOI]
23. Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. AgeAdjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: The ADJUST-PE Study. JAMA 2014; 311(11): 1117-1124. [DOI]
24. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2014; 35(43): 3033-80. [DOI]
25. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(17): 1760-8. [DOI]
26. Gutiérrez García I, Pérez Cañadas P, Martínez Uriarte J, et al. D-dimer during pregnancy: establishing trimester-specific reference intervals. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2018; 78(6): 439-442. [DOI]
27. Cakar MA, Gunduz H, Varim C, et al. Correlation between D-dimer levels and coronary artery reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction patients after thrombolytic treatment. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2013; 24(6): 608-612. [DOI]
28. Türkoglu C, Harbalıoglu H, Seker T, et al. Ddimers are associated with coronary artery disease severity assessed using Syntax and Syntax II scores in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2020; 39(12): 687-693. [DOI]

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian South Medical Journal

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb