Volume 27, Issue 1 (Iranian South Medical Journal 2024)                   Iran South Med J 2024, 27(1): 13-25 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abolhosni Y, Absalan M, Zakeri M, Bakhtiari S. The Effect of Using Vancomycin Powder and Betadine for Skin Preparation in the Prevention of Wound Infection in Grades I and II Open Fractures of the Lower Limb: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Iran South Med J 2024; 27 (1) :13-25
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-1982-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Department of Operating Room Technology, School of Paramedicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- Clinical Research Development Unit, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
4- Department of Operating Room, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , Bakhtiari@nm.mui.ac.ir
Abstract:   (688 Views)
Background: Skin preparation in the operating room is important to prevent infection after open fracture surgery. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of the simultaneous use of betadine and vancomycin powder for the preparation of damaged skin in preventing wound infection in open fractures of the lower limb undergoing internal fixation surgery.
Materials and Methods: The present study was a double-blind clinical trial on 40 men with open fractures of the lower limb who underwent open reduction surgery and internal fixation. Patients were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. In order to prepare the damaged skin before surgery, betadine 10% was used in the control group and betadine 10% plus 2 grams of vancomycin powder in the intervention group. Open wounds caused by the removal of bone from the skin and surgical incisions within 30 days (days 1, 2, 14 and 30) after surgery were scored in terms of infection using the ASEPSIS scoring method. The results were analyzed in SPSS 22 software (p<0.05).
Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean age, duration of emergency hospitalization until surgery, height, weight and body mass index, marital status, fracture grade, bleeding rate, wound infection score and surgery duration (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The simultaneous use of betadine and vancomycin powder has no effect on wound infection after open reduction surgery and internal fixation in patients with open lower limb fractures.
 
Full-Text [PDF 449 kb]   (291 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Surgery
Received: 2024/06/11 | Accepted: 2024/09/15 | Published: 2024/10/28

References
1. Bankhead-Kendall B, Gutierrez T, Murry J, et al. Antibiotics and open fractures of the lower extremity: less is more. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 45(1): 125-9. [DOI]
2. Kim PH, Leopold SS. Gustilo-Anderson classification Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(11): 3270–74. [DOI]
3. Zalavras CG. Prevention of infection in open fractures. Infect Dis Clin 2017; 31(2): 339-52. [DOI]
4. Depypere M, Morgenstern M, Kuehl R, et al. Pathogenesis and management of fracture-related infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26(5): 572-8. [DOI]
5. Morgenstern M, Kühl R, Eckardt H, et al. Diagnostic challenges and future perspectives in fracture-related infection. Injury 2018; 49: S83-S90. [DOI]
6. Shivapour SK, Jackson ND, Schleining JA, et al. Surgical intervention for vertebral osteomyelitis in a calf. Vet Surg 2019; 48(6): 1064-70. [DOI]
7. Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices. Injury 2006; 37(2): S59-S66. [DOI]
8. Blair JA, Stoops TK, Doarn MC, et al. Infection and non:union: after fasciotomy for compartment syndrome associated with tibia fractures: a matched cohort comparison. J Orthop Trauma 2016; 30(7): 392-6. [DOI]
9. Kortram K, Bezstarosti H, Metsemakers W-J, et al. Risk factors for infectious complications after open fractures; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2017; 41(10): 1965-82. [DOI]
10. Wordsworth M, Lawton G, Nathwani D, et al. Improving the care of patients with severe open fractures of the tibia: the effect of the introduction of Major Trauma Networks and national guidelines. Bone Joint J 2016; 98(3): 420-4. [DOI]
11. Sliepen J, Onsea J, Zalavras CG, et al. What is the diagnostic value of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for surgical site infection in fracture-related infection?. Injury 2021; 52(10): 2879- 85. [DOI]
12. Rothrock JC. Alexander's care of the patient in surgery-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2022. [Article]
13. Borchardt RA, Tzizik D. Update on surgical site infections: the new CDC guidelines. J Am Acad Physician Assist 2018 ; 31(4): 52-4. [DOI]
14. Li J, Wang Q, Lu Y, et al. Relationship between time to surgical debridement and the incidence of infection in patients with open tibial fractures. Orthop Surg 2020; 12(2): 524-32. [DOI]
15. Chua W, Murphy D, Siow W, et al. Epidemiological analysis of outcomes in 323 open tibial diaphyseal fractures: a nine-year experience. Singapore Med J 2012; 53(6): 385-9. (Persian) [Article]
16. Reuss BL, Cole JD. Effect of delayed treatment on open tibial shaft fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2007; 36(4): 215. [Article]
17. Nambi G, Salunke AA, Thirumalaisamy S, et al. Single stage management of Gustilo type III A/B tibia fractures: Fixed with nail & covered with fasciocutaneous flap. Chin J Traumatol 2017; 20(02): 99-102. [DOI]
18. Matsumura T, Takahashi T, Miyamoto O, et al. Clinical outcome of conversion from external fixation to definitive internal fixation for open fracture of the lower limb. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24(5): 888-93. [DOI]
19. Elniel AR, Giannoudis PV. Open fractures of the lower extremity: Current management and clinical outcomes. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3(5): 316-25. [DOI]
20. Link T. Guidelines in practice: preoperative patient skin antisepsis. AORN J 2022; 115(2): 156-66. [DOI]
21. Gmur MK, Karpiński TM. Povidone-iodine in wound healing and prevention of wound infections. Eur J Biol Res 2020; 10(3): 232-9. [DOI]
22. Cuello CMC, Fernández-de Thomas RJ, De Jesus O, et al. Prevention of surgical site infection in lumbar instrumented fusion using a sterile povidone-iodine solution. World Neurosurg 2021; 151: e700-e6. [DOI]
23. Goswami K, Austin MS. Intraoperative povidone-iodine irrigation for infection prevention. Arthroplast Today 2019; 5(3): 306-8. [DOI]
24. Katarincic JA, Fantry A, DePasse JM, et al. Local modalities for preventing surgical site infections: an evidence-based review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26(1): 14-25. [DOI]
25. Maemoto R, Noda H, Ichida K, et al. Superiority trial comparing intraoperative wound irrigation with aqueous 10% povidone–iodine to saline for the purpose of reducing surgical site infection after elective gastrointestinal surgery: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 2021; 11(6): e051374. [DOI]
26. Barreto R, Barrois B, Lambert J, al e. Addressing the challenges in antisepsis: focus on povidone iodine. J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 56(3): 1060. [DOI]
27. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, et al. Povidone iodine in wound healing: A review of current concepts and practices. Int J Surg 2017; 44: 260-8. [DOI]
28. Allegranzi B, Zayed B, Bischoff P, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16(12): e288-e303. [DOI]
29. Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ, Kanafani ZA, al e. Severe surgical site infection in community hospitals: epidemiology, key procedures, and the changing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28(9): 1047-53. [DOI]
30. Deogaonkar¹ K, Menon A, Zaveri G. Surgical Site Infections in Orthopaedics :Epidemiology & Microbiology. J Clin Orthop 2019; 4(2): 7-11. [Article]
31. Chiang H-Y, Herwaldt LA, Blevins AE, Cho E, Schweizer ML. Effectiveness of local vancomycin powder to decrease surgical site infections: a metaanalysis. Spine J 2014; 14(3): 397-407.h [DOI]
32. Qadir R, Costales T, Coale M, Mulliken A, Zerhusen Jr T, Joshi M, et al. Vancomycin powder use in fractures at high risk of surgical site infection. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35(1): 23-8. [DOI]
33. Caroom C, Tullar JM, Benton Jr EG, et al. Intrawound vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections in posterior cervical fusion. Spine 2013; 38(14): 1183-7 . [DOI]
34. Molinari RW, Khera OA, Molinari III WJ. Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 476-82. [DOI]
35. Dreyfus JG, Yu H, Begier E, Gayle J, Olsen MA. Incidence and burden of Staphylococcus aureus infection after orthopedic surgeries. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2022; 43(1): 64-71. [DOI]
36. Kirchner GJ, Smith NP, Garner MR. Intra-wound vancomycin and tobramycin powder for infection prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma surgery: Economically justifiable?. Injury 2021; 52(11): 3340-3. [DOI]
37. Emohare O, Ledonio CG, Hill BW, et al. Cost savings analysis of intrawound vancomycin powder in posterior spinal surgery. Spine J 2014; 14(11): 2710-5. [DOI]
38. O'Neill KR, Smith JG, Abtahi AM, et al. Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder. Spine J 2011; 11(7): 641-6. [DOI]
39. Jonokuchi AJ, Knopman J, Radwanski RE, et al. Topical vancomycin to reduce surgical-site infections in neurosurgery: Study protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 64: 195-200. [DOI]
40. Tornetta III P, Ricci WM, Ostrum RF,et al. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults: eBook without Multimedia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2024. [Article]
41. Wilson A, Sturridge M, Treasure T, et al. A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for postoperative wound infections for use in clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Lancet 1986; 327(8476): 311-2. [DOI]
42. Siah C, Childs C. A systematic review of the ASEPSIS scoring system used in non-cardiac-related surgery. J Wound Care 2012; 21(3): 124-30. [DOI]
43. Pillen H, Miller M, Thomas J, et al. Assessment of wound healing: validity, reliability and sensitivity of available instruments. Wound Pract Res 2009; 17(4): 208-17. [Article]
44. Do HTT, Edwards H, Finlayson K. Development of a surgical wound assessment tool to measure healing and risk factors for delayed wound healing in Vietnam: a Delphi process .J Wound Care 2022; 31(5): 446-58 . [DOI]
45. Yatimparvar G, Shafiee S, Ehteshami S, et al. Effect of topical vancomycin powder on the prevention of surgical site infections in craniotomy surgeries. Pak J Med Health Sci 2020; 14(2): 1221-5. [Article]
46. Shafizad M, Shafiee S, Ebrahimzadeh K, et al. Effect of topical vancomycin on prevention of surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2019; 29(174): 1-12. (Persian) [Article]
47. Tubaki VR, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Effects of using intravenous antibiotic only versus local intrawound vancomycin antibiotic powder application in addition to intravenous antibiotics on postoperative infection in spine surgery in 907 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013. [DOI]
48. Mauffrey C, Bailey JR, Bowles RJ, et al. Acute management of open fractures: proposal of a new multidisciplinary algorithm. Orthop 2012; 35(10): 877-81 . [DOI]
49. Adhikari P, Nabiyev VN, Bahadir S, et al. Does the application of topical intrawound vancomycin powder affect deep surgical site infection and the responsible organisms after spinal surgery?: a retrospective case series with a historical control group. Asian Spine J 2020; 14(1): 72. [DOI]
50. Hanada M, Nishikino S, Hotta K, et al. Intrawound vancomycin powder increases post-operative wound complications and does not decrease periprosthetic joint infection in primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27: 2322-7. [DOI]
51. Takeuchi H, Oda I, Oshima S, et al. Is the administration of vancomycin to operative field effective? Studying from operative wound drainage tube culture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30: 215-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02579-0 [DOI]
52. Rastegar R, Rahimi F, Vahdat K, et al. Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration for Operations in a Teaching Hospital in Bushehr, Iran. Iran South Med J 2021; 24 (3): 188-196. [Article]

Send email to the article author


Rights and Permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian South Medical Journal

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb