Volume 25, Issue 2 (Iranian South Medical Journal 2022)
Iran South Med J 2022, 25(2): 156-170 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanavati M, Taherzadeh H, Motamed N, Hamadi A. Conformity of Hospital Information Systems to ISO Standard 9241/ 110 in Hospitals Affiliated to Bushehr University of Medical Sciences: the Users, Point of View. Iran South Med J 2022; 25 (2) :156-170
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-1615-en.html
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-1615-en.html
1- Statistics and Information Technology Office, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
2- Statistics and Information Technology Office, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran ,h.taherzadeh@bpums.ac.ir
3- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
2- Statistics and Information Technology Office, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran ,
3- Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
Abstract: (1703 Views)
Background: Extensive use of hospital information systems mandate their assessment.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in hospitals affiliated to Bushehr University of Medical Sciences from May 2018 to February 2019. Data were collected using ISO 9241/110 standard questionnaire. This self-administered questionnaire was distributed among 568
software users in the university hospitals. The questionnaire has 75 items set in seven general domains. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18 Chicago: SPSS Inc. Scores between different groups were compared using independent sample t-test and ANOVA.
Results: Two domains, suitability for task (3.23±0.6) and learnability (3.20±0.44), had the highest score and the domain of controllability (2.97±0.74) had the lowest score. Comparison of total score among three software companies A (3.13±0.45), B (3.03±0.45) and C (3.75±0.42) and also the scores of seven domains showed that Company C with the highest total mean score and mean scores in all domains had the highest compliance with the ISO standard 9241/110. The mean score of nursing staff in all domains was lower than other clinical users. Also, in comparison to other hospitals, the mean score of Bushehr hospitals staff was lower in all domains except the controllability domain.
Conclusion: It is recommended to use Company C’s software for other hospitals due to its greater user compliance, or to upgrade Company A’s software. Software designers are required to pay more attention to controllability and self-descriptiveness domains.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in hospitals affiliated to Bushehr University of Medical Sciences from May 2018 to February 2019. Data were collected using ISO 9241/110 standard questionnaire. This self-administered questionnaire was distributed among 568
software users in the university hospitals. The questionnaire has 75 items set in seven general domains. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18 Chicago: SPSS Inc. Scores between different groups were compared using independent sample t-test and ANOVA.
Results: Two domains, suitability for task (3.23±0.6) and learnability (3.20±0.44), had the highest score and the domain of controllability (2.97±0.74) had the lowest score. Comparison of total score among three software companies A (3.13±0.45), B (3.03±0.45) and C (3.75±0.42) and also the scores of seven domains showed that Company C with the highest total mean score and mean scores in all domains had the highest compliance with the ISO standard 9241/110. The mean score of nursing staff in all domains was lower than other clinical users. Also, in comparison to other hospitals, the mean score of Bushehr hospitals staff was lower in all domains except the controllability domain.
Conclusion: It is recommended to use Company C’s software for other hospitals due to its greater user compliance, or to upgrade Company A’s software. Software designers are required to pay more attention to controllability and self-descriptiveness domains.
Keywords: Care, Hospital administration, Management information system, Hospital information system, ISO 9241/110
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Hospitals and Other Health Facilities
Received: 2022/01/27 | Accepted: 2022/05/31 | Published: 2022/09/26
Received: 2022/01/27 | Accepted: 2022/05/31 | Published: 2022/09/26
References
1. Riazi H, Bitaraf A, Abedian S. Performance Assessment Of Hospital Information Systems. Tehran: Sorour kiyan, 2013, 6-30. (Persian)
2. Al-Nashmi, M.E. The Role Of Vendors In Health Information Systems Implementation: Assessing The Perception Of Healthcare Executives And Vendors. Dissertation. Pittsburgh: University Of Pittsburgh, 2003, 184. [Article]
3. Saeed bakhsh S, Ehshamami A, kasaee isfahani M. Evaluation of medical records module of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences selected by ISW 10-9241. Isfahan: Health Information Management, 2012: 9(2): 490-501. (Persian) [Article]
4. Shih YY. User satisfaction with HIS outsourcing. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM); 2010 Jun 28-30; Tokyo, Japan; 2010. [Article]
5. Hajavi A, Shahmoradi L. Problems In Hospital Information Systems Evaluation And Solutions. Islamic countries head hall, Tehran, Iran 2004. (Persian) [Article]
6. Hamborg KC, Vehse B, Bludau HB. Questionnaire Based Usability Evaluation Of Hospital Information Systems. Electron J Inf Syst Eval 2004; 7(1): 21-30.
7. Mousavi A., Hemati M., Kayal S. et al. Assessing the Usability of Hospital Information Systems at Qom University of Medical Sciences Hospital Based on Isometric Standard. Journal Of Qom University of Medical Sciences 2014;8(4): 58-63. (Persian) [Article]
8. Mahmoudi Meymand M, Yaghoobi T, Naghdi Sede P. Comparing The Laboratory Module Of Hospital Information System Software In Hospitals Of Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences, Based On The International Standard ISO 9241-110. Health Inf Manage 2015; 12(3): 287-96. (Persian) [Article]
9. Ghaderi Nansa L, Piri Z, Salmani E.et al. Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems in University Hospitals of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran: Nurses Perspectives. Health Inf Manage 2013; 10(2): 190-200. (Persian) [Article]
10. Wager K, Wickham lee F, Glaser GP. Managing Health Care Information System. Newyork: Jossey-Bass; 2005, 20. [Article]
11. Shanbehzadeh M, Jamshidian M, Yousefian O, et al. Evaluating the Usability of Hospital Information Systems based on ISO 9241-10 Standard: A cross-sectional study. Appl Health Inf Tech 2021; 2(1): 20-9. (Persian) [DOI]
12. Mirzaei A, Mohamadyari E, Mohammadi A, et al. Evaluation of Hospital Information System of hospitals Affiliated to a Univversity of Medical Sciences in West of Iran. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 2019; 19(1): 34-9. [Article]
13. Ehteshami A, Sadoughi F, Saeedbakhsh S, et al. Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10. Acta Inform Med 2013; 21(1): 36-41. [DOI]
14. Hosseini Teshnizi S, Hayavi Haghighi MH, Alipour J. Evaluation of health Information Systems with ISO 9241-10 standard: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Inform Med Unlocked 2021; 25: 100639. [DOI]
15. Ahmadi M, Shahmoradi L, Brabadi M. et al. Usability of hospital information systems based on IsoMetric 9241.Tehran: Hakim Research Journal 2011: 13(4): 226-33. (Persian) [Article]
16. Montazeri M, Khajouei R, Montazeri M. Evaluating Hospital Information System According to ISO 9241 part 12. Digit Health 2020; 6: 2055207620979466. [DOI]
17. Hossieini TeshniziI S, Alipour J, Haghighi MH. Usability Evaluation of Hospital Information System: A Cross-Sectional Study. AMI 2020; 42(2): 118-25. [Article]
18. Gholampour A, Moazen Jamshidi MH, Habibi A. et al. The Impact of Hospital Information System on Nurses' Satisfaction in Iranian Public Hospitals: the Moderating Role of Computer Literacy. Journal of Information Technology Management 2020; 12(4): 141-159. [DOI]
19. Ghazi Saeedi M, Safdari R., Sharifian R. et al. Evaluation of Hospital Information System (HIS) In General Hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Perspective Of Physician and Nurses). Payavard 2014; 7(5): 447-56. (Persian) [Article]
20. Bundschuh BB, Majeed RW, Bürkle T, et al. Quality of human-computer inter-actionresults of a national usability survey of hospital-IT in Germany. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011; 11(69). [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
