Volume 28, Issue 5 (Iran South Med J 2026)
Iran South Med J 2026, 28(5): 864-878 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zarei M, Zarei A, Zarea Gavgani V, Zare-Farashbandi F. Barriers and Facilitators Information of Pregnant Women's: A Scoping Review. Iran South Med J 2026; 28 (5) :864-878
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-2454-en.html
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-2454-en.html
1- Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Hamedan, Iran
3- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ,f_zare@mng.mui.ac.ir
2- Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Hamedan, Iran
3- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4- Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ,
Abstract: (115 Views)
Background: Despite the large volume of published health information, pregnant women still face barriers to accessing pregnancy-related resources. The aim of the present study is to identify barriers to and facilitators of information for pregnant women by reviewing resources in this field.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. English and Persian databases were searched to retrieve articles, theses, research projects, and governmental reports pertaining to the study objectives. Of the 2,135 initial records, after a two-level screening process by six individuals (including four primary reviewers with a kappa agreement coefficient of 0.82 and two specialists for resolving disagreements), 23 studies were ultimately included in the final analysis.
Results: The following barriers emerged from a review of the studies: contradictory information on a single topic regarding pregnancy; confusion, worry and anxiety when facing a large volume of information; financial constraints; low health literacy; lack of professional information search skills; limited access to healthcare providers (nurses, midwives, doctors); low social support from family, friends, and peers. On the other hand, healthcare providers, use of social media, launching and introducing reputable websites and systems in the field of pregnancy, support from families, friends, and acquaintances were some of the facilitators of providing information for pregnant women.
Conclusion: Information barriers and facilitators for pregnant women are a multidimensional issue. Empowering pregnant women to access and evaluate health information requires the cooperation among health and information sector officials, individuals and the community.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a scoping review. English and Persian databases were searched to retrieve articles, theses, research projects, and governmental reports pertaining to the study objectives. Of the 2,135 initial records, after a two-level screening process by six individuals (including four primary reviewers with a kappa agreement coefficient of 0.82 and two specialists for resolving disagreements), 23 studies were ultimately included in the final analysis.
Results: The following barriers emerged from a review of the studies: contradictory information on a single topic regarding pregnancy; confusion, worry and anxiety when facing a large volume of information; financial constraints; low health literacy; lack of professional information search skills; limited access to healthcare providers (nurses, midwives, doctors); low social support from family, friends, and peers. On the other hand, healthcare providers, use of social media, launching and introducing reputable websites and systems in the field of pregnancy, support from families, friends, and acquaintances were some of the facilitators of providing information for pregnant women.
Conclusion: Information barriers and facilitators for pregnant women are a multidimensional issue. Empowering pregnant women to access and evaluate health information requires the cooperation among health and information sector officials, individuals and the community.
Keywords: Pregnant women, pregnancy, health, information sources, information barriers, information facilitators
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Gynecology
Received: 2025/10/23 | Accepted: 2026/04/13 | Published: 2026/05/25
Received: 2025/10/23 | Accepted: 2026/04/13 | Published: 2026/05/25
References
1. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the Internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth 2011; 38(4): 336–345. [DOI]
2. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, et al. Listening to mothers II: report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive in partnership with Lamaze International. J Perinat Educ 2007; 16(4): 15–27. [DOI]
3. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285(20): 2612–2621. [DOI]
4. Plovnick RM, Zeng QT. Reformulation of consumer health queries with professional terminology: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6(3): e27. [DOI]
5. Gui X, Chen Y, Kou Y, et al. Investigating support seeking from peers for pregnancy in online health communities. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact 2017; 1(CSCW): 1–19. [DOI]
6. Zhu C, Zeng R, Zhang W, et al. Pregnancy-related information seeking and sharing in the social media era among expectant mothers: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(12): e13694. [DOI]
7. Bakhireva LN, Young BN, Dalen J, et al. Patient utilization of information sources about safety of medications during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 2011; 56(7-8): 339–343. [Article]
8. Henry A, Crowther C. Sources of advice on medication use in pregnancy and reasons for medication uptake and cessation during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40(2):173–175. [DOI]
9. Nordeng H, Ystrøm E, Einarson A. Perception of risk regarding the use of medications and other exposures during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 66(2): 207–214. [DOI]
10. Kamali S, Ahmadian L, Bahaadinbeigy K, et al. Health information needs of pregnant women: information sources, motives and barriers. Health Info Libr J 2018; 35(1): 24–37. [DOI]
11. Ghiasi A. Health information needs, sources of in-formation, and barriers to accessing health information among pregnantwomen: a systematic review of research. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34(8): 1320-1330. [DOI]
12. Van De Belt TH, Hendriks AF, Aarts JW, et al. Evaluation of patients' questionsto identify gaps in information provision to infertile patients. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2014; 17(2): 133-140. [DOI]
13. Guerra-Reyes L, Christie VM, Prabhakar A, et al. Mind the gap: assessing the disconnect between postpartum healthinformation desired and health information received. Womens Health Issues 2017; 27(2): 167-173. [DOI]
14. Narasimhulu DM, Karakash S, Weedon J, et al. Patterns of internet use by pregnant women, and reliability of pregnancy-related searches. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20(12): 2502-2509. [DOI]
15. De Man AM, Rashedi A, Nelen W, et al. Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2020; 23(3): 170-178. [DOI]
16. Storr T, Maher J, Swanepoel E. Online nutrition in-formation for pregnant women: a content analysis. Matern Child Nutr 2017; 13(2): e12315. [DOI]
17. Hameen-Anttila K, Jyrkka J, Enlund H, et al. Medicines information needs during pregnancy: a multi-national comparison. BMJ Open 2013; 3(4): e002594. [DOI]
18. Hill Z, Kirkwood B, Edmond K. Family and community practices that promote child survival, growth and development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004: 133. [Article]
19. Kwast BE. Quality of care in reproductive health programmes: monitoring and evaluation of quality improvement. Midwifery 1998; 14(4): 199–206. [DOI]
20. Lu Y, Barrett LA, Lin RZ, et al. Understanding information needs and barriers to accessing health information across all stages of pregnancy: Systematic Review. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2022; 5 (1): e32235. [DOI]
21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097. [DOI]
22. Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2015 :6-22. [Article]
23. Shieh C, McDaniel A, Ke I. Information–Seeking and its Predictors in Low-Income Pregnant Women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54(5): 364-372. [DOI]
24. Frawley J, Adams J, Broom A, et al. Majority of Women Are Influenced by Nonprofessional Information Sources When Deciding to Consult a Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioner during Pregnancy. J Altern Complement Med 2014; 20(7): 571-577. [DOI]
25. Theroux R. Media as a Source of Information on Pregnancy and Childbirth. Nurs Womens Health 2011; 15(1): 62-67. [DOI]
26. Turner KE, Fuller S. Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries? Online J Public Health Inform 2011; 3(2): ojphi.v3i2.3631. [DOI]
27. Widnes SF, Schjøtt J, Granas AG. Risk perception and medicines information needs in pregnant women with epilepsy--a qualitative study. Seizure 2012; 21(8): 597-602. [DOI]
28. Raj S, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Brewer A, et al. Information needs and experiences from pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders: a qualitative analysis of narrative responses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21(1): 743. [DOI]
29. Criss S, Baidal JA, Goldman RE, et al. The Role of Health Information Sources in Decision-Making Among Hispanic Mothers During Their Children's First 1000 Days of Life. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19(11): 2536-2543. [DOI]
30. Hameen-Anttila K, Nordeng H, Kokki E, et al. Multiple information sources and consequences of conflicting information about medicine use during pregnancy: a multinational Internet-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(2): e60. [DOI]
31. Benedict C, Thom B, Friedman DN, et al. Young adult female cancer survivors' unmet information needs and reproductive concerns contribute to decisional conflict regarding posttreatment fertility preservation. Cancer 2016; 122(13): 2101-2109. [DOI]
32. Perez-Lu JE, Bayer AM, Iguiniz-Romero R. Information = equity? How increased access to information can enhance equity and improve health outcomes for pregnant women in Peru. J Public Health (Oxf) 2018; 40(suppl_2): ii64-ii73. [DOI]
33. Bjelke M, Martinsson AK, Lendahls L, et al. Using the Internet as a source of information during pregnancy — A descriptive cross-sectional study in Sweden. Midwifery 2016; 40: 187-191. [DOI]
34. Gerdts C, Raifman S, Daskilewicz K, et al. Women's experiences seeking informal sector abortion services in Cape Town, South Africa: A descriptive study. BMC Women's Health 2017; 17(1): 95. [DOI]
35. Bianchi CM, Huneau J-F, Gaëlle Le G, et al. Concerns, attitudes, beliefs and information seeking practices with respect to nutrition-related issues: a qualitative study in French pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16(1): 306. [DOI]
36. Zimmerman MS. Information Poverty and Reproductive Healthcare: Assessing the Reasons for In-equity between Income Groups. Soc Work Public Health 2017; 32(3): 210-221. [DOI]
37. Ghiasi A, Keramat A, Farjamfar M, et al. Perceived Barriers to Accessing Pregnancy-Related Health Information Among Married Adolescent Women: A Qualitative Study in Iran. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33(1): 58-63. [DOI]
38. Dalton JA, Rodger D, Wilmore M, et al. The Healthe Babies App for antenatal education: Feasibility for socially disadvantaged women. Plose One 2018; 13(5): e0194337. [DOI]
39. Mackintosh N, Agarwal S, Adcock K, et al. Online resources and apps to aid self-diagnosis and help seeking in the perinatal period: A descriptive survey of women's experiences. Midwifery 2020; 90: 102803. [DOI]
40. Huang Y, Bian W, Han Y. Effect of knowledge acquisition on gravida’s anxiety during COVID-19. Sex Reprod Healthc 2021; 30: 100667. [DOI]
41. McCarthy R, Byrne G, Brettle A, et al. Midwife-moderated social media groups as a validated information source for women during pregnancy. Midwifery 2020; 88: 102710. [DOI]
42. Stonbraker S, Haight E, Lopez A, et al. Digital Educational Support Groups Administered through WhatsApp Messenger Improve Health-Related Knowledge and Health Behaviors of New Adolescent Mothers in the Dominican Republic: A Multi-Method Study. Informatics (MDPI) 2020; 7(4): 51. [DOI]
43. Buston K, MacLachlan A, Henderson M. How Do Pregnant Women with Additional Health or Social Care Needs Experience Parenting Groups: Evidence from Delivery of Enhanced Triple P for Baby and Mellow Bumps as Part of the Trial of Healthy Relationships Initiatives in the Very Early Years (THRIVE). Child Care Pract 2022; 28(4): 721-738. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
