1. Tsang PH, Li G, Brun YV, et al. Adhesion of single bacterial cell in micronewton range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103(15): 5764-8. [
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0601705103]
2. Vollrath F. Strength and structure of spiders' silks. J Biotechnol 2000; 74(2): 67-83. [
DOI:10.1016/S1389-0352(00)00006-4]
3. Stewart RJ, Weaver JC, Morse DE, et al. The tube cement of Pharamatopoma californica: a solid foam. J Exp Biol 2004; 207(Pt 26): 4727-34. [
DOI:10.1242/jeb.01330]
4. DeMoor S, Waite JH, Jangoux M, et al. Characterization of the adhesive from cuvierian tubules of the sea cucumber holothuria forskali (echinodermata, holothuroidea). Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2003; 5(1): 45-57. [
DOI:10.1007/s10126-002-0049-2]
5. Kamino K, Inoue K, Maruyama T, et al. Barnacles cement proteins. Importance of disulfide bonds in their insolubility. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(35): 27360-5. [
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M910363199]
6. Silva SS, Mano JF, Reis RL. Potential applications of natural origin polymer-based systems in soft tissue regeneration. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2010; 30(3):200-21. [
DOI:10.3109/07388551.2010.505561]
7. Heim M, Römer L, Scheibel T. Hierarchical structures made of proteins. The complex architecture of spider webs and their constituent silk proteins. Chem Soc Rev 2010; 39(1): 156-64. [
DOI:10.1039/B813273A]
8. Lee BP, Messersmith PB, Israelachvili JN, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Annu Rev Mater Res 2011; 41: 99-132. [
DOI:10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429]
9. Strausberg RL, Link RP. Protein-based medical adhesives. Trends Biotechnol 1990; 8(2): 53-7. [
DOI:10.1016/0167-7799(90)90134-J]
10. Cranford SW, Tarakanova A, Pugno NM, et al. Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs. Nature 2012; 482(7383): 72-6. [
DOI:10.1038/nature10739]
11. Z, Cranford S, Ackbarow T, et al. Robustness-strength performance of hierarchical alpha-helical protein filaments. Int J Appl Mech 2009; 1(1): 85-112. [
DOI:10.1142/S1758825109000058]
12. Sen D, Buehler MJ. Structural hierarchies define toughness and defect-tolerance despite simple and mechanically inferior brittle building blocks. Sci Rep 2011; 1: 35. [
DOI:10.1038/srep00035]
13. Waite JH. The DOPA ephemera: a recurrent motif in invertebrates. Biol Bull 1992; 183(1): 178-84. [
DOI:10.2307/1542421]
14. Qin Z, Buehler MJ. Impact tolerance in mussel thread networks by heterogeneous material distribution. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2187. [
DOI:10.1038/ncomms3187]
15. Deming TJ. Mussel byssus and biomolecular materials. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1999; 3(1): 100-5. [
DOI:10.1016/S1367-5931(99)80018-0]
16. DS, Gim Y, Yoo HJ, et al. Practical recombinant hybrid mussel bioadhesive fp-151. Biomaterials 2007; 28(24): 3560-8. [
DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.039]
17. Lim S, Choi YS, Kang DG, et al. The adhesive properties of coacervated recombinant hybrid mussel adhesive proteins. Biomaterials 2010; 31(13): 3715-22. [
DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.063]
18. Murphy JL, Vollenweider L, Xu F, et al. Adhesive performance of biomimetic adhesive-coated biologic scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11(11): 2976-84. [
DOI:10.1021/bm1007794]
19. Waite JH. Evidence for a repeating 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanin-contaning and hydroxyproline-containing decapeptide in the adhesive protein of the mussel Mytilus edulis. J Biol Chem 1983; 258(5): 2911-5.
20. Silverman HG, Roberto FF. Understanding marine mussel adhesion. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2007; 9(6): 661-81. [
DOI:10.1007/s10126-007-9053-x]
21. Lawlor EP. Discover Nature at the Seashore: Things to know and things to do. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Book; 1992.
22. Ragnarsson SA, Burgos JM. Separating the effects of a habitat modifier, Modiolus modiolus and substrate properties on the associated megafauna. Journal of Sea Research 2012; 72: 55–63. [
DOI:10.1016/j.seares.2012.05.011]
23. Danner EW, Kan Y, Hammer MU, et al. Adhesion of mussel foot protein Mefp-5 to mica: an underwater superglue. Biochemistry 2012; 51(33): 6511-8. [
DOI:10.1021/bi3002538]
24. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248-54. [
DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3]
25. Ninan L, Monahan J, Storshine RL, et al. Adhesive strength of marine mussel extracts of porcine skin. Biomaterial 2003; 24(22): 4091-9. [
DOI:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00257-6]
26. Arnow LE. Colorimetric determination of the components of 3, 4 dihydroxyphenylalanine tyrosine mixtures. J Biol Chem 1937; 118(2): 531-7.
27. Paz MA, Flückiger R, Boak A, et al. Specific detection of quinoproteins by redox-cycling staining. J Biol Chem 1991; 266(2): 689-92.
28. Zhao H, Waite JH. Linking adhesive and structural proteins in the attachment plaque of Mytilus californianus. J Biol Chem 2006; 281(36): 26150-8. [
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M604357200]
29. Zhao H, Waite JH. Proteins in load-bearing junctions: The histidine-rich metal-binding protein of mussel byssal. Biochemistry 2006; 45(47):14223-31. [
DOI:10.1021/bi061677n]
30. Walker JM. p The Protein Protocols Handbook. Humana Press, a Part of Springer Science. 1985.
31. Brazee, SL, Carrington E, Interspecific comparison of the mechanical properties of mussel byssus. Biological Bulletin. 2006; 211, 263–274 [
DOI:10.2307/4134548]
32. Hwang DS, Sim SB, Cha HJ. Cell adhesion biomaterial based on mussel adhesive protein fused with RGD peptide. Biomaterials 2007; 28(28):4039-46. [
DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.028]