Volume 21, Issue 6 (Iranian South Medical Journal 2019)
Iran South Med J 2019, 21(6): 472-480 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Pourshafie S, Izadfard Z, Jafarzadeh S. The Effect of Vehicle Noise on Hearing Thresholds in Heavy Vehicle Drivers. Iran South Med J 2019; 21 (6) :472-480
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-984-en.html
URL: http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-984-en.html
1- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Audiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,jafarzadehs@mums.ac.ir
2- Department of Audiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,
Abstract: (4228 Views)
Background: Noise-induced hearing loss is a common causes of sensorineural hearing loss. Drivers of heavy vehicles such as bus and truck are more exposed to the noise associated with traffic and automobiles than other members of the community, which can damage their auditory system. The present study was conducted to investigate the hearing status of heavy vehicle drivers and its relationship with factors such as age under 40 years, work experience and mean daily working hours.
Materials and Methods: The present study examined the level of sensorineural hearing loss in 132 drivers, i.e. 264 ears. The drivers’ details, including age, work experience and mean daily working hours, were first recorded. Every candidate then underwent otoscopy and pure-tone audiometry at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz performed by an audiologist in a sound treated room. The blood pressure of these drivers was also recorded using normal techniques of blood pressure measurement. The drivers with other sensorineural hearing loss factors, including presbycusis at ages over 40 and ototoxicity, were excluded from the study.
Results: The drivers’ mean age was found to be 34.0±5.097 years, their mean work experience 11.19±5.158 years and their daily working hours 5-16 hours with a mean of 9.2±56.275 hours. The highest frequency of hearing loss was observed at a frequency of 4000 Hz in about 23% of the drivers, followed the prevalence observed at 8000 Hz. No significant differences were found between hearing thresholds of intra-city and intercity drivers. Moreover, significant relationships were observed between the level of hearing loss and factors such as age, work experience and the mean daily working hours.
Conclusion: Hearing loss was observed in about one quarter of the drivers, suggesting a high frequency of noise-induced hearing loss in drivers despite the elimination of other factors contributing to sensorineural hearing loss.
Materials and Methods: The present study examined the level of sensorineural hearing loss in 132 drivers, i.e. 264 ears. The drivers’ details, including age, work experience and mean daily working hours, were first recorded. Every candidate then underwent otoscopy and pure-tone audiometry at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz performed by an audiologist in a sound treated room. The blood pressure of these drivers was also recorded using normal techniques of blood pressure measurement. The drivers with other sensorineural hearing loss factors, including presbycusis at ages over 40 and ototoxicity, were excluded from the study.
Results: The drivers’ mean age was found to be 34.0±5.097 years, their mean work experience 11.19±5.158 years and their daily working hours 5-16 hours with a mean of 9.2±56.275 hours. The highest frequency of hearing loss was observed at a frequency of 4000 Hz in about 23% of the drivers, followed the prevalence observed at 8000 Hz. No significant differences were found between hearing thresholds of intra-city and intercity drivers. Moreover, significant relationships were observed between the level of hearing loss and factors such as age, work experience and the mean daily working hours.
Conclusion: Hearing loss was observed in about one quarter of the drivers, suggesting a high frequency of noise-induced hearing loss in drivers despite the elimination of other factors contributing to sensorineural hearing loss.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
Otolaryngology
Received: 2018/06/17 | Accepted: 2018/10/3 | Published: 2019/01/1
Received: 2018/06/17 | Accepted: 2018/10/3 | Published: 2019/01/1
References
1. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Davis A. Noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2012; 14(61): 274-80.
2. Liberman MC. Noise-Induced hearing loss: permanent versus temporary threshold shifts and the effects of hair cell versus neuronal degeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 875: 1-7.
3. Ivory R, Kane R, Diaz RC. Noise-induced hearing loss: a recreational noise perspective. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 22(5): 394-8.
4. Lewis RC, Gershon RR, Neitzel RL. Estimation of permanent noise-induced hearing loss in an urban setting. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47(12): 6393-9.
5. Caciari T, Rosati MV, Casale T, et al. Noiseinduced hearing loss in workers exposed to urban stressors. Sci Total Environ 2013; 463-464: 302-8.
6. Soltanzadeh A, Ebrahimi H, Fallahi M, et al. Noise induced hearing loss in iran: (1997-2012): systematic review article. Iran J Public Health 2014; 43(12): 1605-15.
7. Yao C, Ma AK, Cushing SL, et al. Noise exposure while commuting in Toronto - a study of personal and public transportation in Toronto. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46(1): 62.
8. Stucken EZ, Hong RS. Noise-induced hearing loss: an occupational medicine perspective. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 22(5): 388-93.
9. Janghorbani M, Sheikhi A, Pourabdian S. The prevalence and correlates of hearing loss in drivers in isfahan, iran. Arch Iran Med 2009; 12(2): 128-34.
10. Mikulec AA, Lukens SB, Jackson LE, et al. Noise exposure in convertible automobiles .J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125(2): 121-5.
11. Alizadeh A, Etemadinezhad S, Charati JY, et al. Noise-induced hearing loss in bus and truck drivers in Mazandaran province, 2011. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2016; 22(2): 193-8.
12. Karimi A, Nasiri S, Kazerooni FK, et al. Noise induced hearing loss risk assessment in truck drivers. Noise Health 2010; 12(46): 49-55.
13. Unlu I, Kesici GG, Basturk A, et al. A comparison of the effects of solvent and noise exposure on hearing, together and separately . Noise Health 2014; 16(73): 410-5.
14. Shrestha I, Shrestha BL, Pokharel M, et al. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss among traffic police personnel of kathmandu metropolitan city. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2011; 9(36): 274-8.
15. Indora V, Khaliq F, Vaney N. Evaluation of the auditory pathway in traffic policemen. Int J Occup Environ Med 2017; 8(2): 109-16.
16. Balaji R, Rajasegaran R, John NA, et al. Hearing impairment and high blood pressure among bus drivers in puducherry. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(2): CC08-10.
17. Fuente A, Hickson L. Noise-induced hearing loss in Asia. Int J Audiol 2011;50 Suppl 1:S3-10.
18. Lie A, Skogstad M, Johnsen TS, et al. Hearing status among Norwegian train drivers and train conductors .Occup Med (Lond) 2013; 63(8): 544-8.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
